Summary:
EJ Ferris is a mall cop now, but she's a former Air Force investigative officer who was injured in the line of duty. She took the mall cop job while she hunts down a position in whatever police department will take her, though with a bum knee, the hunt is not going well. During her morning patrol through the throngs of early-morning mall walkers, she finds a dead man in a boutique's display window. The investigating detective from the Vernonville PD hardly gives her the time of day, even though EJ's done some questioning already and just wants to help in any way she can. The detective dismisses her, showing just how highly he regards mall cops. Even though the detective explicitly orders EJ to stay out of the way, she can't fight her investigatory nature, and after two more bodies are found, she devotes her time to finding out who the killer is.
Thoughts:
Really well written. DiSilverio is great at spinning the story so you can't quite put all of the story together until the very end. I had suspicions throughout, but there was always a new clue that could distract from one suspect and bring up two more. There were enough curiosities that the murders could be connected, but then again, they could not be. EJ is a really strong character, too, great at solving the little dilemmas that come to a mall cop's attention, and smart enough to find the loose ends of the murder plots to tie up neatly. And since this is the first in a series, it has just enough loose ends that it leaves you wanting more, and soon! I'll definitely be continuing on with this series. Yes please.
Book 27 of 50
Pages: 288
Genre: Mystery
Grade: A
Would I Recommend?: Absolutely. Especially if you've ever worked retail, and particularly at a mall.
Saturday, August 17, 2013
Saturday, August 10, 2013
The Bling Ring (Nancy Jo Sales)
Summary:
A non-fiction narrative of the breaking-and-entering crime spree plaguing celebs from 2008 to 2009. It discusses the time line and the accomplices through interviews with the culprits themselves. Sales previously wrote an article about the crime ring, dubbed "The Bling Ring" by TMZ and the media, and then expanded on that for this book. The book discusses the curiosity and expectations teens and young adults are beginning to have about celebrities and becoming one themselves. This book is the basis for the movie of the same name produced by Sofia Ford Coppola.
Thoughts:
This could not possibly be drier. The way that Sales lays out the conversations with the Bling Ring suspects is bland, and she hops from interview to introspection to interview with little to no segues, sometimes within the same chapter. I was curious about the book because I heard about the movie and heard there was a book about it, and of course I'm going to read the book first. The book took me far too long to read, because the writing was lacking in any emotion or interest. The subject matter is really quite interesting. A bunch of teenagers broke into celebrity homes and stole clothes, purses, cash, even intimate items and a hand gun. It really could have been a more intriguing book, if only it were written with a better narrative style. I was happy to be done with it.
Book 26 of 50
Pages: 288
Genre: non-fiction
Grade: B-/C+
Would I Recommend?: Meh, it's borderline readable.
A non-fiction narrative of the breaking-and-entering crime spree plaguing celebs from 2008 to 2009. It discusses the time line and the accomplices through interviews with the culprits themselves. Sales previously wrote an article about the crime ring, dubbed "The Bling Ring" by TMZ and the media, and then expanded on that for this book. The book discusses the curiosity and expectations teens and young adults are beginning to have about celebrities and becoming one themselves. This book is the basis for the movie of the same name produced by Sofia Ford Coppola.
Thoughts:
This could not possibly be drier. The way that Sales lays out the conversations with the Bling Ring suspects is bland, and she hops from interview to introspection to interview with little to no segues, sometimes within the same chapter. I was curious about the book because I heard about the movie and heard there was a book about it, and of course I'm going to read the book first. The book took me far too long to read, because the writing was lacking in any emotion or interest. The subject matter is really quite interesting. A bunch of teenagers broke into celebrity homes and stole clothes, purses, cash, even intimate items and a hand gun. It really could have been a more intriguing book, if only it were written with a better narrative style. I was happy to be done with it.
Book 26 of 50
Pages: 288
Genre: non-fiction
Grade: B-/C+
Would I Recommend?: Meh, it's borderline readable.
Saturday, August 3, 2013
Heartburn (Nora Ephron)
Summary:
Rachel is a successful food writer, a published cookbook author, and seven months pregnant with her second child. She's blindsided when her husband, Mark, tells her that he's in love with someone else, and he's not going to leave the other woman. What follows is the breaking down of a marriage, the realizations of when he was cheating, and where, and who knew it was going on before Rachel did. Rachel tries to see the bright side of all of it, but who wants to be a pregnant woman going through a divorce?
Thoughts:
This was really difficult to read. Not only because of the subject matter, but because it was so dryly written. I loved Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail. They're go-to romantic comedy gold for me, and When Harry Met Sally... is another great movie. I knew Nora Ephron could write great things, and I was looking forward to reading something from her. I was sadly disappointed. The book took me nearly two weeks to wade through. That's an EPIC amount of time for something that is literally 178 pages. 178 pages. I could've read it in the space of a few hours if I'd put my mind to it. Particularly because it talks through 15 different recipes. But it was so damn dismal. I had to force myself to get through it. Now granted, this book was published in 1983, so its references were bound to be stale. But the whole thing was completely depressing, and Rachel was so downtrodden through the whole ordeal. Rachel was also very stereotypically Jewish and wore her religion like a banner on her chest throughout. I understand that Jewish people are sometimes like that, and I don't have a problem with it by any means, as they have every right to proclaim their religious affiliation. But it did make it all the more difficult to relate to Rachel. (A side note: I'm a Presbyterian, a protestant. I have no problems with religion. If Rachel was stereotypically Presbyterian or Catholic or Baptist or Lutheran or Atheist or anything else, I'd probably still be put off by it. It just irks when people exaggerate such things that don't have much other reason to exist within a book. I find it boring and unnecessary.) The cover carries with it three quotes from the Chicago Tribune, The NY Times Book Review, and Harper's Bazaar, all singing the book's praises, of course. But I disagree with all three. The Tribune wrote at the time, "Funny and touching... proof that writing well is the best revenge." I didn't laugh. I just hurt for the poor woman. Sure, I hated the cheating husband, but it's not hard to do that when he's, y'know. A cheating husband. The Times wrote, "Great fun... Though Heartburn bristles ferociously with wit, it's not lacking in soul." It wasn't fun. It wasn't witty. It was depressing. And Harper's Bazaar. "Nora Ephron's first novel is warm, witty, and wise." Nope, nope, nope. It was almost clinical, and cynical, and sad. I hate to say it, but it just broke the heart the whole way through. The only light-hearted bit was at the end where there was a pie thrown in Mark's face. I might've laughed if not for the reason why she felt the need to throw the pie, and the fact that a page and a half later, Rachel talks about when they were expecting their first child, and Mark used to sing her to sleep and sing her awake and how sweet it used to be, and all I felt was sad for her that her husband was a complete bastard. Completely depressing. COMPLETELY.
Book 25 of 50
Pages: 178
Genre: fiction
Grade: D-
Would I Recommend?: Wanna be depressed? Then read this. Want to smile and remember Nora Ephron's great work? Watch When Harry Met Sally, Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail. They'll make you smile far more than this ever will.
Rachel is a successful food writer, a published cookbook author, and seven months pregnant with her second child. She's blindsided when her husband, Mark, tells her that he's in love with someone else, and he's not going to leave the other woman. What follows is the breaking down of a marriage, the realizations of when he was cheating, and where, and who knew it was going on before Rachel did. Rachel tries to see the bright side of all of it, but who wants to be a pregnant woman going through a divorce?
Thoughts:
This was really difficult to read. Not only because of the subject matter, but because it was so dryly written. I loved Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail. They're go-to romantic comedy gold for me, and When Harry Met Sally... is another great movie. I knew Nora Ephron could write great things, and I was looking forward to reading something from her. I was sadly disappointed. The book took me nearly two weeks to wade through. That's an EPIC amount of time for something that is literally 178 pages. 178 pages. I could've read it in the space of a few hours if I'd put my mind to it. Particularly because it talks through 15 different recipes. But it was so damn dismal. I had to force myself to get through it. Now granted, this book was published in 1983, so its references were bound to be stale. But the whole thing was completely depressing, and Rachel was so downtrodden through the whole ordeal. Rachel was also very stereotypically Jewish and wore her religion like a banner on her chest throughout. I understand that Jewish people are sometimes like that, and I don't have a problem with it by any means, as they have every right to proclaim their religious affiliation. But it did make it all the more difficult to relate to Rachel. (A side note: I'm a Presbyterian, a protestant. I have no problems with religion. If Rachel was stereotypically Presbyterian or Catholic or Baptist or Lutheran or Atheist or anything else, I'd probably still be put off by it. It just irks when people exaggerate such things that don't have much other reason to exist within a book. I find it boring and unnecessary.) The cover carries with it three quotes from the Chicago Tribune, The NY Times Book Review, and Harper's Bazaar, all singing the book's praises, of course. But I disagree with all three. The Tribune wrote at the time, "Funny and touching... proof that writing well is the best revenge." I didn't laugh. I just hurt for the poor woman. Sure, I hated the cheating husband, but it's not hard to do that when he's, y'know. A cheating husband. The Times wrote, "Great fun... Though Heartburn bristles ferociously with wit, it's not lacking in soul." It wasn't fun. It wasn't witty. It was depressing. And Harper's Bazaar. "Nora Ephron's first novel is warm, witty, and wise." Nope, nope, nope. It was almost clinical, and cynical, and sad. I hate to say it, but it just broke the heart the whole way through. The only light-hearted bit was at the end where there was a pie thrown in Mark's face. I might've laughed if not for the reason why she felt the need to throw the pie, and the fact that a page and a half later, Rachel talks about when they were expecting their first child, and Mark used to sing her to sleep and sing her awake and how sweet it used to be, and all I felt was sad for her that her husband was a complete bastard. Completely depressing. COMPLETELY.
Book 25 of 50
Pages: 178
Genre: fiction
Grade: D-
Would I Recommend?: Wanna be depressed? Then read this. Want to smile and remember Nora Ephron's great work? Watch When Harry Met Sally, Sleepless in Seattle and You've Got Mail. They'll make you smile far more than this ever will.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)